Chris Berg
Because this guy is a right-wing ideologue. A highly intelligent and persuasive right-wing ideologue but a right-wing ideologue none-the-less. I've read his book on the history of free speech so I know all about him. Believe me, the point he sits on the political spectrum, makes that on which you sit look like a Gingin hippy festival.
It will therefore be to his interest that you reveal yourself early enough in the electoral cycle for his buddies to capitalise on the fact.
My apologies to Chris Berg but you have to call a spade a spade.
Thursday, 16 April 2015
Demonstrably False Assumptions
Raja Janakar
Minimum wages need to be maintained at a minimum subsistence level and this level of income should not be taxed at all for anyone.
This country has been governed by conservative governments for too many years. These governments have seen fit to tax the poor to feed the rich and rely on what they term the "trickle-down-effect" to redistribute these through the rest of society. What a load of nonsense.
Based on demonstrably false assumptions, here is the evidence for this effect.
The only just and equitable policy is that stated above.
Minimum wages need to be maintained at a minimum subsistence level and this level of income should not be taxed at all for anyone.
This country has been governed by conservative governments for too many years. These governments have seen fit to tax the poor to feed the rich and rely on what they term the "trickle-down-effect" to redistribute these through the rest of society. What a load of nonsense.
Based on demonstrably false assumptions, here is the evidence for this effect.
The only just and equitable policy is that stated above.
Wednesday, 15 April 2015
Leadership
Terry Barnes
"Above all, Lincoln believed in something greater than himself, and acted on his principles."
"With malice towards none, with charity for all"
Leaders have the ability to see what is right and to force or manipulate events to progress in that direction.
Can anyone see this characteristic in any of our "leaders"?
Or in any of the "leaders" of the political parties we are forced to vote for.
"Above all, Lincoln believed in something greater than himself, and acted on his principles."
"With malice towards none, with charity for all"
Leaders have the ability to see what is right and to force or manipulate events to progress in that direction.
Can anyone see this characteristic in any of our "leaders"?
Or in any of the "leaders" of the political parties we are forced to vote for.
Shirt-front Policies
Trisha Jha
Look at this. Another thought-bubble-non-policy produced by a shirt-front PM at the head of an idiotic government.
All this for maybe 3% of babies. Lots of budget savings there.
Look at this. Another thought-bubble-non-policy produced by a shirt-front PM at the head of an idiotic government.
All this for maybe 3% of babies. Lots of budget savings there.
Never Ever Again
John Baron
You have give it to them. The GOP is nothing if not resilient. After two consecutive defeats by the forces of the left, the far right-wing elements in American society continue to find expression. Putting a baby face on your candidate and dressing him up in verbiage about the changing of the generations increases your appeal to the youth vote, butt they are still far right ideologues with a far right view of the world and if they ever get elected again they will do irreparable damage to life as we know it.
Now that the hyperbole is gone. John is being a good journalist, writing a balanced piece, marketable but not really saying much. He implies that there is a ghost of a chance of the republicans winning. An objective observer would have to think that the tea-party-policies of the far right could never attract sufficient votes of a rational-cognitive electorate. But let's not be surprised ever again. The electorate in the US is a tiny proportion of the voting public, because the mere act of voting is not compulsory, so almost anything could still happen.
We in Australia are, right now, as the US did in the dubya years, experiencing the consequences of electoral complacency, and the assumption that the electorate (as distinct from the voting public) will act in a rational manner. The cringe quality of Friar Tuck is so reminiscent of that arroused by George dubya himself, that I have to take anti-cringe medication every time I watch the news. If we don't cringe we are tempted to succumb to fits of hysterical laughter, and/or outright ridicule.
Yet these are our elected leaders.
You have give it to them. The GOP is nothing if not resilient. After two consecutive defeats by the forces of the left, the far right-wing elements in American society continue to find expression. Putting a baby face on your candidate and dressing him up in verbiage about the changing of the generations increases your appeal to the youth vote, butt they are still far right ideologues with a far right view of the world and if they ever get elected again they will do irreparable damage to life as we know it.
Now that the hyperbole is gone. John is being a good journalist, writing a balanced piece, marketable but not really saying much. He implies that there is a ghost of a chance of the republicans winning. An objective observer would have to think that the tea-party-policies of the far right could never attract sufficient votes of a rational-cognitive electorate. But let's not be surprised ever again. The electorate in the US is a tiny proportion of the voting public, because the mere act of voting is not compulsory, so almost anything could still happen.
We in Australia are, right now, as the US did in the dubya years, experiencing the consequences of electoral complacency, and the assumption that the electorate (as distinct from the voting public) will act in a rational manner. The cringe quality of Friar Tuck is so reminiscent of that arroused by George dubya himself, that I have to take anti-cringe medication every time I watch the news. If we don't cringe we are tempted to succumb to fits of hysterical laughter, and/or outright ridicule.
Yet these are our elected leaders.
Friday, 10 April 2015
oh no
Went to my first ALP Branch meeting last night.
Pretty cool.
Lots of heavy duty ALP faithful, lifetime members, union dudes etc.
And they are all around my age.
Mark Mcgowan, leader of the state opposition, MLA for Rockingham, and the next Premier of Western Australia, attended and spoke to us. We are in a seriously bad situation with the state economy and budget. I haven't been paying attention so I didn't realise how bad. The loss of our triple A credit rating, which I did hear about and commented on, pointed to a bad situation, but I hadn't realised it was a full blown crisis..
He said Barney was gifted with a $3 billion budget deficit on taking office and has so mismanaged everything since then that it has now blown out to $30 billion. Yes that is a tenfold fuckup in the space of six and a half years. These were years of prosperity. The price of iron ore was high. Large royalties were paid.
WHERE IS ALL THAT MONEY!!!???
I am angry. Aren't you?????
Pretty cool.
Lots of heavy duty ALP faithful, lifetime members, union dudes etc.
And they are all around my age.
Mark Mcgowan, leader of the state opposition, MLA for Rockingham, and the next Premier of Western Australia, attended and spoke to us. We are in a seriously bad situation with the state economy and budget. I haven't been paying attention so I didn't realise how bad. The loss of our triple A credit rating, which I did hear about and commented on, pointed to a bad situation, but I hadn't realised it was a full blown crisis..
He said Barney was gifted with a $3 billion budget deficit on taking office and has so mismanaged everything since then that it has now blown out to $30 billion. Yes that is a tenfold fuckup in the space of six and a half years. These were years of prosperity. The price of iron ore was high. Large royalties were paid.
WHERE IS ALL THAT MONEY!!!???
I am angry. Aren't you?????
Saturday, 28 March 2015
The Champion Defender of Everyone and Everything (As Long as it begins with a twig)
Ian Verrender
Does anyone remember the days of the anti-mining-tax campaign and obscene footage of Twiggy Forrest, one of the most offensively wealthy people in the world, dressed in the uniform of a mine worker, pretending to be one with the working class, while prancing around on national television effectively denying truth and justice to all?
Shall we all applaud the turn of events showcased in this article?
Back in the day, in the Eighties, whence all goodness began, there was a book floating around at my alma mater called "Mineral Economics" (don't ask me who the author is) which introduced and promoted a strange concept. This concept was called a 'resource rent tax'. Now a 'resource rent tax' has a number of mystical semi-miraculous but also arcane characteristics. It doesn't tax investment,
nor capital, but only income and not accrual income but only cash income. It is the saviour of capitalism itself and can transmogrify any abstruse mining company into a soft fluffy family friendly entity capable only of acting in the interests of the nation at large.
The circularity of public discourse is appalling. This concept was applied to the offshore gas and oil industry without any complaint. Then it came around to the land based minerals industry and a firestorm of hellish proportions irrupted. The most absurd criticism was that it didn't actually produce any revenue. By definition these things don't produce revenue during the investment phase. They are designed to do this. Well Duh.
Resource rent taxes are in fact an idea dreamed up by miners for miners in the interests of miners. The minute anyone mentions a full blown sovereign wealth fund which would have the benefits we actually need the miners drag out the resource rent tax and say 'no, no. Look over here. Don't look over there. Here good. There bad. here are all the reasons why.'
And we all just keep going around in circles. getting nowhere at a tremendous speed.
Does anyone remember the days of the anti-mining-tax campaign and obscene footage of Twiggy Forrest, one of the most offensively wealthy people in the world, dressed in the uniform of a mine worker, pretending to be one with the working class, while prancing around on national television effectively denying truth and justice to all?
Shall we all applaud the turn of events showcased in this article?
Back in the day, in the Eighties, whence all goodness began, there was a book floating around at my alma mater called "Mineral Economics" (don't ask me who the author is) which introduced and promoted a strange concept. This concept was called a 'resource rent tax'. Now a 'resource rent tax' has a number of mystical semi-miraculous but also arcane characteristics. It doesn't tax investment,
nor capital, but only income and not accrual income but only cash income. It is the saviour of capitalism itself and can transmogrify any abstruse mining company into a soft fluffy family friendly entity capable only of acting in the interests of the nation at large.
The circularity of public discourse is appalling. This concept was applied to the offshore gas and oil industry without any complaint. Then it came around to the land based minerals industry and a firestorm of hellish proportions irrupted. The most absurd criticism was that it didn't actually produce any revenue. By definition these things don't produce revenue during the investment phase. They are designed to do this. Well Duh.
Resource rent taxes are in fact an idea dreamed up by miners for miners in the interests of miners. The minute anyone mentions a full blown sovereign wealth fund which would have the benefits we actually need the miners drag out the resource rent tax and say 'no, no. Look over here. Don't look over there. Here good. There bad. here are all the reasons why.'
And we all just keep going around in circles. getting nowhere at a tremendous speed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)